« February 2009 | Main | April 2009 »

March 23, 2009

Phil's great-grandfather Phil

My son Phil is named after my mother's late father, Philip George Eckert. When my son is older, he will wonder about his namesake. What was he like? What did he do? How did he change the lives of those around him?

As a preemptive answer to these questions, I asked my relatives to submit stories about Phil Eckert, which I compiled into a "booklet." I hope my son will eventually find it interesting despite its lack of illustrations. In any case, this fun project will help us preserve some fond memories that would otherwise fade away.

I won't post the entire booklet here, but below are the two stories I contributed.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

THE ECONOMICAL COACH

All of us who knew Phil well were struck by his frugality, his interest in sports, and his engineer's mindset. These traits collided in somewhat comical fashion during one childhood visit to South Carolina, when he tried to teach me how to play golf. This in and of itself was generous and appropriate, since I wanted to learn the game and Phil was a skilled player. But, Phil being Phil, he decided that his grandson should have goals beyond mere mastery of the basic golf swing. He decided that I, a lefty, should learn to play right-handed.

Phil offered two reasons for this assignment. First, he had a theory that, if you led the club with your stronger arm, you could control the swing better. I can't remember the details, but he cited certain left-handed pros who golfed right-handed. Most likely these players had not had access to left-handed equipment while growing up, which brings us to Phil's second reason. Since I was just getting started, why not learn to use the cheaper and more abundant right-handed clubs?

Somehow the difficulty of learning golf, and the possibility that learning it right-handed might add to the difficulty, never entered into Phil's calculations.

I displayed no enthusiasm in trying the right-handed swing, but Phil was not easily discouraged. He found much to praise in my unimpressive shots, noting my admirable aim when the ball dribbled straight ahead along the fairway. Eventually, he recognized that I was not happy being a guinea pig in his experiment, and he let me use a left-handed club, even after my shotmaking proved equally shaky from the other side of the ball. In fact, he later spent a summer visiting every garage sale within a 25-mile radius of his home in order to assemble a nearly complete set of lefty clubs for me.

I never got very good at golf, but I do enjoy the game to this day, and Phil deserves credit for that.

THE ANALYTICAL ACTOR

Some people have such a knack for telling stories that it's easy to imagine them performing on-stage. Phil was not one of those people. As a storyteller, he tended to focus on details of limited interest to his audience, rather than offering a compelling buildup to a satisfying punchline. And yet his many hobbies included community theatre.

I never saw him perform, but I recall a visit to South Carolina during which Phil was rehearsing the comedic play You Can't Take It With You. Not only had Phil been unable to attend the first six weeks of rehearsals, he had been cast as Donald, an African American man in his 30s. This seemed like a recipe for comedy of the unintended sort, yet Phil was eager to rise to the challenge.

Phil saw that pretending to be African American was not a feasible option, so he adapted the part to reflect his Caucasian heritage. I remember him struggling with a scene in which some of the other characters are discussing the Russian Revolution of 1917. One character excitedly says, "Sure! And the Czar, and the Cossacks!" And in the original script, Donald, being a man of limited education and not recognizing the historical context, adds, "And the freeing of the slaves?"

Phil thought it would be odd for that particular line to come out of his mouth, so he challenged himself to identify an event whose significance to white people was precisely equivalent to what the freeing of the slaves meant to black people. It was acting reduced to a logic puzzle – something he could solve with research and reasoning.

As I recall, Phil worked intermittently on this problematic line during our entire vacation. I don't know what the final decision was; in retrospect, I doubt that a sensible answer to the ethnic analogy problem even exists. But I'll always admire the way Phil pursued it just as he pursued so many of life's other challenges: hungry for an elegant solution, and confident that diligence and intelligence would lead him to it.

March 21, 2009

The race in a Chuckanutshell

Some notes on today's Chuckanut Mountain 50K:

* A Confession. I'm ashamed to admit that I recently started using a performance-enhancing drug. It's called diphenhydramine, although some of you may know it as Benadryl. I use it to fall asleep the night before races I'm nervous about. I hope my competitors don't mind.

* Retired? No, Not Yet. During the pre-race milling around, more than one person said to me, "I thought you had retired from ultras!" Well, no, I wouldn't put it that way. I realize I've been rather quiet about my running lately, but GEEZ....

* Attack of the Road Guy (Part 1). Having never done this race before, my understanding of the course was that the first and last 6.3 miles were on a mostly flat gravel path, with 18.5 miles of hilly, muddy, sometimes technical trails in between. I figured I should use my road speed to get a lead before the tricky trail stuff began, so that's what I did. But my split of ~41:30 into Aid Station #1 put me less than a minute ahead of my closest pursuer, Aaron Heidt of British Columbia.

* Shades of White River. I came into this race wary of Aaron because he had snuck up on me during the 50th mile of the White River 50 last summer, forcing me to outkick him. This time things turned out a bit differently. He caught me during the 10th mile, pulled ahead after a polite chat, and pretty much dominated the race after that, finishing in 3:53. Still, the race did remind me of White River in another way: I was basically satisfied with my effort, yet somewhat disappointed to have wound up so far behind the winner.

* The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner. Although I struggled pretty badly over the more technical sections of the course, I saw no other runners for much of the morning. I guess once Aaron and Hal Koerner pulled away during mile 14, I was far enough ahead of everybody else that only one guy (Keegan Rathcamp) caught me on the ridge trail despite my usual gracelessness in avoiding rocks and roots. I have to say that it was nice to be alone. Running slowly isn't so bad when there's nobody whizzing by you and making you feel even slower.

* Attack of the Road Guy (Part 2). When I arrived at Aid Station #5 (same as Aid Station #1), I was told that I was in 3rd place, about a minute behind Hal. This was EXACTLY what I needed to hear for motivational purposes. Hal is a strong all-around runner; nevertheless, it was almost lunchtime, and the Moeben-clad Oregonian was suddenly on my menu. He held me off for a couple of miles, but by running my last 6.3 miles in almost exactly the same time as my first 6.3, I ultimately pulled away and finished in 4:01:05, about 70 seconds ahead of Hal.

* Most Improved? Among the top male finishers, the one who surprised me the most was Michael Havrda (6th place in 4:09), who (as far as I know) is not accustomed to finishing ahead of people like Brian Morrison. Way to go, Michael! The first three female finishers (Ellie Greenwood in 4:34, Shawna Wilskey in 4:42, and Lisa Polizzi in 4:46) are not at all familiar to me, but this probably says more about me than it does about them.

* Beating the Odds. I carpooled to the race with Tom Ederer and Jeff Phillips. In a car of three random runners, you might figure that, on any given day, one guy might race well, one OK, and one poorly. But all three of us came away satisfied; the results show that Tom (4:36) and Jeff (5:17) easily beat their previous Chuckanut times.

March 6, 2009

What are they driving at?

Check out this page from the PerkinElmer brochure for its EnVision multilabel plate readers:

What exactly is the point of this? A couple of possibilities come to mind....

(A) PerkinElmer is the Porsche of plate reader makers. Operating our plate readers is thrilling. It will make you feel young, sexy, and powerful.

(B) PerkinElmer understands that you're a rebel who is not constrained by local laws or common sense. If you want to drive your car way over the speed limit while talking on your cell phone, you do it! Similarly, our plate readers will enable the experiments of your dreams, regardless of their legality or ethical implications.

Whatever the specific message the company is trying to convey, I ain't buyin' it.