« May 2006 | Main | July 2006 »

June 29, 2006

At what point do "extreme" sports become pointless masochism?

Last Saturday night, my friend Brian was about to win the 100-mile Western States Endurance Run when he collapsed on the Placer High School track, about 300 yards from the end. He was dragged by his support crew across the finish line to the medical support area and spent the next day in a hospital.

Is Western States a dumb race whose benefits are outweighed by the risks? I don't believe so. But what about Primal Quest, a race taking place this week in Utah, where four-person teams will cover hundreds of miles over several days, working their way across whitewater rapids, rocky canyons and other dangerous terrain while battling sleep deprivation in hopes of grabbing a share of the $250,000 in prize money? Don't we have to draw the line somewhere?

I hesitate to criticize any sport that others enjoy. As someone who's run 100-kilometer races, I know what it's like to be mocked by outsiders who can't fathom the appeal of an event that I personally find fulfilling. At the same time, it seems indisputable that going without adequate sleep for days is unhealthy and that going without adequate sleep for days while exercising continuously is even less healthy. Based on this logic, I'd argue that any event that entails competing for an entire day and night with little or no sleep and then continuing well into the following day or longer is a very, very bad idea. And a huge prize jackpot that encourages dreadfully tired people to take any additional risks that might make them richer? That seems downright misanthropic.

If Brian wants to take another crack at Western States next year, I'll wish him the best. But if my wife wants to do Primal Quest -- she has expressed interest in it -- I may have to issue an ultimatum of some sort.

June 28, 2006

Duh!

Every so often I come up with an idea that is good, yet so obvious that I feel stupid for not thinking of it a long time ago. There must be some particular circumstances that jolt my brain into these moments of clarity after months or even years of obliviousness, but what could they possibly be?

My latest "Duh!" moment occurred in the lab on Monday afternoon. I was washing my scintillation vials' radioactive contents down the drain (this is legal, by the way) and then throwing the vials away. "Boy, I sure seem to toss out a lot of vials," I thought numbly. "But wait..." -- the numbness started to recede -- "Do I really have to get rid of them? Once they've been rinsed out, they're no longer radioactive. Shouldn't I just reuse them? ... Hey, I'm an environmentalist!"

Of course, it would have been even better if this had dawned on me back in, say, 2003.

So what prompted my cerebral neurons to actually start communicating with each other? In this case, I think it was the sight of a box full of hundreds of vials destined for the vial graveyard. Somehow that image depressed me enough to trigger five seconds of contemplating how I could reduce my personal production of lab waste.

It was a very satisfying and productive five seconds. I have no idea when my next fleeting moment of cognitive competence will arise, but I'm looking forward to it!

June 25, 2006

The ethics of cutthroat kicks

With 200 meters to go, I've basically given up on passing Keith. He looks fresh, as if he hasn't been racing all-out up to this point, and I have a mediocre kick under even the best of circumstances. This is not the best of circumstances. We're barreling down a sidewalk in Golden Gardens Park, dodging dozens of beachgoers oblivious to our duel, and I don't even know where the finish line is. Then, suddenly, a gift: the course veers right, Keith goes straight, and all that's between me and the finish is 80 meters of soft grass. I start to accelerate.... But is it right to take advantage of a competitor's mistake at an admittedly confusing intersection?

Before you answer, here's a bit more context. Keith and I were the anchor legs of our respective teams at the 100-mile Mountains to Sound Relay. With RunningShoes.com having already laced up a 33-minute victory, the question remaining was whether the Seattle Running Company (represented by yours truly) could overtake Callen Construction. Callen began the final 6-mile running leg in 2nd place, about 5 minutes ahead of us, despite a 20-minute detour earlier in the day. According to one team member, Callen's talented road cyclist had beaten the course-marking crew to a checkpoint and went up a long hill that turned out to not be part of the course. (See the Comments for the race director's version of the story.)

The errant cyclist was on my mind with a half-mile to go as Keith missed a left turn and I drew even with him, foreshadowing the wacky ending described above. This was my first of two opportunities to concede the runner-up spot, recognizing that maybe the construction guys had already been penalized enough for their creative route choices. On the other hand, our mountain biker had gotten a flat tire, and our kayaker was using a vessel vastly inferior to those of the top paddlers. I could even argue that I was not at my best because I had spent the morning working at an understaffed aid station rather than staying out of the sun. All the teams had handicaps to overcome; why assume Callen's problems were more deserving of sympathy than ours? And what of my teammates' valiant efforts to bring us this close to a runner-up finish? Would I be justified in deciding on their behalf that we didn't really deserve to be 2nd? Still, in a setting where competitive juices sometimes boil over, wouldn't it have been apt to acknowledge in a small way that there is more to sports than annihilating your opponents?

I wasn't thinking quite this philosophically as I sped toward the finish line. In the heat of the moment, I simply saw an opening and instinctively exploited it. If I had to do it again, though, I'm not sure whether I'd make the same decision. I'd be interested to hear what others think.

June 23, 2006

Hooray for the day job!

My work in the lab went extraordinarily well this week. I'm not sure if I can describe it in a way that will make sense and be interesting to outsiders, but I'll give it a shot. Consider this entry an experiment that may or may not be worth replicating!

As some of you know, I study the metabolism of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1, which has the unusual ability to use one-carbon compounds such as methanol (CH3OH) as its sole source of carbon and energy. (When someone at a party asks me what I do, I usually say, "I study bacteria that can grow using alcohol as their only source of food." This often prompts comments such as, "Yeah, I once had a college roomate who was kind of like that....") In determining how these bacteria process the methanol, I measure such things as their production of carbon dioxide (CO2) under various conditions. Still with me? Well, the rates of CO2 production in a couple of recent experiments seemed unbelievably high, so I spent most of Wednesday poring over my lab notebooks and Excel spreadsheets, looking for calculation errors. I eventually did find an error that, when corrected, dropped one set of numbers back into the normal range. But what about that absurdly high CO2 flux in the mutant strain? No calculation errors there.... Could it be real?!? (Cue the scientist-on-the-brink-of-a-discovery music. I'm hearing some plucked violins, a few triangle taps on the offbeats....)

Since production of CO2 requires oxygen (O2), rapid CO2 production should be accompanied by rapid O2 consumption. Too bad we don't have an O2 electrode.... I realized, however, that if I put the mutant strain in a closed vial (as I normally do anyway for my CO2 experiments), it should run out of O2 much faster than the normal ("wild-type") strain and should thus stop producing CO2 much sooner. So I tested this hypothesis. Just as I predicted, the mutant produced lots of CO2 for a couple minutes and then stopped, whereas the wild type made CO2 at a much slower rate but for a much longer period of time! (Triumphant trumpet solo goes here.) In conclusion, the mutant is indeed capable of generating CO2 much more quickly than the wild type. Exactly how it does this will be a topic of future research.

So, did that text help you taste the excitement of the discovery?

Didn't think so. At least I tried.

Perhaps a more transparent anecdote is this: I was so pleased with my data that even another disappointing Wednesday night track race (8:49.2 for 3000m) failed to dampen my spirits for long.

Data to die for

June 22, 2006

How to monitor blogs

Do you keep track of other people's blogs by bookmarking them all and then visiting each one daily to see if they've been updated that day? That's what I did until this past Tuesday, when I finally admitted that this system is only practical if the total number of blogs you read is less than, say, five. I'm now using a news aggregator, also known as a feed reader, and am much happier because of it. I mention all this in case any readers of this blog are even farther behind the times than I am and have yet to discover the joys of news aggregators. This post is for you, you clueless Luddites! Turn off your record players and pay attention!

In brief, a news aggregator monitors your "playlist" of blogs, checking them for updates and notifying you when new content has been posted. Some aggregators are web-based, while others are downloadable programs that are launched from your hard drive. If you use a web-based aggregator, you simply log onto the aggregator website, which then displays and/or offers links to new blog entries that have been published since your last login.

The aggregator I currently use and recommend is NewsGator, although Google Reader also looks decent. To get started with either of these, you just create an account by providing a username/email address, password, etc. Then you tell the aggregator which blogs you want to subscribe to. The only tricky part here is that you can't always enter the blog's "home page" address (e.g., running-blogs.com/crowther); you may need to specify the address of the blog's feed (e.g., running-blogs.com/crowther/index.xml). A feed is a specially coded version of the blog that allows it to be exported to aggregators. Many blogs have little RSS or XML buttons (RSS stands for Really Simple Syndication, which is written in XML, a coding language similar to HTML) that, if clicked upon, will show you the feed's address. However, if all you know is the address of the main blog page (e.g., running-blogs.com/crowther), NewsGator can usually figure out the feed address for you. (It does this in the "URL & Import" tab within the "Add Feeds" section.)

What if you only follow one or two blogs that aren't updated very often? In that situation, you might want to sign up at Blogarithm.com, which will email you when new content is posted to those blogs.

I hope this tidbit is helpful. If so, pass it on!

June 21, 2006

A Fam-iliar Story

Anthony "Fam" Famiglietti is a top U.S. distance runner who recently launched the website runfam.com. (Thanks to eliterunning.com for the link.) His online biography includes the following:

Fam's very first race took place during a field day event in the fifth grade. It is a day he will never forget. The challenge was to race one lap around the perimeter of the school field. Fam, encompassing an instinct that has never left him, took off at the crack of the gun and bolted to the front of the pack immediately. He quickly left his competitors behind. Unfortunately, he collapsed in the middle of the race, and failed to finish. Even though that day didn't turn out the way he expected, it served as a prelude of what was to come.

Apparently Fam and I have more in common than I would have guessed from a comparison of our PRs. You see, MY distance running career also started with a one-lap-around-the-school-grounds Field Day race.

Up to that point (third grade, in my case), I had been an enthusiastic participant in many sports but had not demonstrated any aptitude in any of them. I was starting to realize that my lack of sprinting speed was pretty much a universal liability in the athletic world. At track camp, the coaches had us do 100s and 200s in groups of three, and invariably I was given a 3rd-place ribbon for losing to the other two people in my heat. This infuriated me. (I was an intense, competitive kid ... as opposed to the intense, competitive adult that I am now.)

Fast-forward to Field Day at Lincoln School in the spring of 1982. As usual, I got pummeled in the 50-yard dash, softball throw, long jump, etc. But then came the Distance Run, which was probably a quarter of a mile or so. Unlike Fam, I showed good pacing instincts and gradually moved up as others faded, eventually crossing the finish line about even with Joel Hector and behind only two other kids. Most of my classmates said that Joel had beaten me -- not surprising, since he was more popular than I -- but the teacher, Mrs. Tomsuden, declared it a tie and awarded 3rd-place certificates to both of us.

My little heart swelled with pride. I had found a sports niche; I was an endurance athlete!

As for Fam, he pursued skateboarding until his family forced him to give it up after a series of accidents. He now runs the steeplechase a lot, which is about as close to skateboarding as you can get when you're a distance runner.

June 19, 2006

Fish out of water

What happens when someone whose best race distance is 100 kilometers does a series of twelve 220-yard sprints on an old dirt track?

In my case, the result was part workout, part performance art. The best analogy I can think of is that of an American League pitcher coming to bat during an interleague game. The athlete is familiar with the task at hand and even practiced it frequently sometime in the distant past, yet the muscles don't quite remember what to do. His main options are to be extremely tentative, thus ensuring failure, or to flail and thrash vigorously, thus risking both failure and injury.

I chose the flail-and-thrash option yesterday in pursuit of relatively fast times (31 seconds on nine of the intervals, 32 on the other three). Fortunately, no permanent damage seems to have been done. Not to my body, anyway; the track now has a few new ruts in it.

I'm reminded of the quote by Casey Stengel, the late manager of the Yankees and Mets, in which he said, "Oldtimers weekends and airplane landings are alike. If you can walk away from them, they're successful."

I think that goes for 220-yard sprint workouts as well.

June 18, 2006

Like father, like son

This being Father's Day, I feel compelled to write something about my dad -- not just because he's a good dad, but because he is and has always been a writer I look up to. He worked for the Rutland Herald for many years as a reporter, editor, and columnist, and subsequently did freelance work and taught seminars on effective business writing. It's the columns which impressed me most, with their reliable mix of humor and wisdom, and this blog is, to some extent, an attempt to emulate them.

It took many years before my own writing style bore any resemblance to my dad's. Even my college articles for the Williams Record were full of unnecessary digressions designed to showcase the author's flair for ridiculous analogies and puns. Somewhere along the line, though, I got better at implementing such Dad dictums as, "Use no more words than needed; make every word count."

If this blog's prose is at least occasionally concise, funny, and/or lyrical, I have my dad to thank for that. And so, as a small Father's Day tribute, I'm reprinting one of my favorite columns of his. Enjoy.

Autumn In Lane 1

by Jack Crowther

[from the Rutland Herald -- October 15, 1983]

You can usually get an inside lane on a weekend at the city's splendid running track next to the vocational school. That makes it congenial if you want to run a mile or two, because the distance is shorter on the inside lanes than on the outer ones. I don't know why this is so, but isn't there a principle of geometry that says, "The shortest distance between start and finish is the inside lane"?

The kids and I went out on a bright, blustery Sunday. The leaves on East Mountain had begun their fall show, warm colors announcing a cold season. The wind through the valley sang its October warning, "Button up, toughen up, get ready."

The boy and the girl did their stretching exercises on the sun-warmed track. It seemed to me that if the inside lanes were better for running, the outside lanes might be better for stretching the leg muscles. But I hesitated to do much coaching on the basis of mere logic. So I kept quiet and they did their stretching on the second and third lanes, which seemed a moderate, sensible approach.

My daughter wondered if I could do "this." "This" consisted of getting down on the knees and leaning back, back, back, until the head and shoulder blades rested on the track. Good for stretching the thighs, she said. I knelt and leaned back, but could move only 45 degrees past vertical. I moved from Lane 3 to Lane 6, but even with that and a series of gutteral noises could only bend another degree or two.

Good sport that she was, she gave me a second chance, this time on the "pretzel," an exercise in which you sit down and interlock your arms and legs so that you look like one. Just seeing it made me dizzy with thirst, but I agreed to try. I chose to straddle Lanes 2 and 3, since the exercise involves both stretching and bunching up. All went well until the point at which I was ready to lock my right heel over my left thigh, when I toppled over.

She laughed; I laughed. Yet in the laughing, as in the gaily colored leaves up on East Mountain, was there not a telltale sign of my own athletic autumn? A season of tighter muscles, stiffer joints and shorter breath?

It was time to run. I kept the watch. My son was hell bent on improving his time for a mile. In an effort to stack the cards slightly in his favor, I moved out to Lane 3, figuring the seconds might be longer there, while he ran in Lane 1. The girl didn't care about time; she was out for the fun of it. She had on a pair of mud-stained Miss Piggy joggers, but her step was light and springy as she circled the track.

I could not have kept up with my son, even though he judged his performance that day abominable, and probably not with my daughter. The boy is 10. I'm embarrassed to say how old the girl is, but she not only wears Miss Piggy joggers, she is still learning to read.

I tried once this summer to accompany the boy on a run of about a mile on city streets. Down Lincoln Avenue was fine. Up over the first small hill, no problem. My longer strides ate up his smaller ones. Down to Vernon Street, piece of cake. Across Vernon ... Across Vernon ... Well he left me. Short of killing myself, or maybe even dying in the attempt, I was not going to stay with him.

Of course, getting myself in condition would make a difference. But to fall back on that rationalization is perhaps to admit on a personal level that, yes, the leaves up on East Mountain are turning, the breeze carries a chill and a mile is a long way to run, even on an inside lane.

June 16, 2006

Once more, with training

Wednesday night was the third race of Project IMPROVE, my attempt to bring my old personal records (PRs) into the 21st century.

The previous Wednesday, I fell short of my 1500m PR. To ensure that I would have better luck in the mile this week, I corrected a few missteps from the previous week. For example:

Last week: raced in road flats. This week: raced in spikes.

Last week: ate a large serving of fried rice about 3.5 hours before the race. This week: ate a lighter meal somewhat earlier in the afternoon.

Last week: had done only one workout at race pace or faster (5 x 400m with 200m jogs in between) prior to the race. This week: did another race-pace workout (the same one, actually).

Last week: ran my first 400m in 67, about a second slower than desired. This week: went out in 67 again. Oops.

The final result was a disappointing 4:32.7, a full 1.1 seconds slower than my lifetime best. Evidently, beating my 1500m and mile PRs is not going to be as easy as I thought. Having already adjusted my diet and shoes to no avail, maybe I need to resort to the drastic option of changing my training.

Or perhaps I should just wear a bodysuit next time.

June 14, 2006

Redefining endurance

The person in my family with the most endurance? That might be my mom. She's not a runner and never has been one, but she's spent the last 19 years teaching in the public schools of Rutland County, Vermont, mostly at the 1st-grade level. 19 years of helping children with every problem imaginable, from dyslexia to incontinence. It boggles the mind.

Tomorrow Mom crosses that special finish line known as retirement. If any Rutlanders are reading this, be sure to give her a high-five and a hug for me.

June 12, 2006

Weekend orgy

It was a pretty quiet weekend here in the Lidstrom Lab ... aside from all of the triparental mating going on. Heh heh heh. I love the term "triparental mating" because it sounds like some sort of weird, morally questionable reproductive behavior. (In fact, it once inspired me to write a fake scientific manuscript.) However, the boring truth about triparental mating is that it's a standard microbiology technique for transferring a plasmid (a circle of DNA, essentially) from one strain of bacteria to another. In addition to the plasmid donor and the plasmid recipient, a helper strain is often used to facilitate the transfer, bringing the total number of "parents" to three.

So that's what I was doing on Saturday -- putting three strains of bacteria on an agar plate and letting them go at it. Then on Sunday, I killed off two of the parents. Ah, the vagaries of being a microbe.... One minute you're at a cool party where everyone is freely exchanging their genetic material, and then before you know it you're being thrown in the autoclave.

June 10, 2006

When is a PR not a PR?

When it's run on an uncertified road course, of course.

Last night was the Fremont 5K, the second race of Project IMPROVE (Improve My Personal Records that are Old and/or Very Embarrassing). This race went better than the previous one even though I got outkicked for the win by Kyle Smits, whose college PRs at Georgetown represent a level of fitness that I will never, ever attain. My time was 15:03 (rounded up from 15:02.3 according to road race convention), which is better than my college 5K track PR of 15:06. But the course was changed this year (new feature: uphill finish to avoid construction!) and hasn't been certified yet, so perhaps I'm still stuck with the 15:06. Or I could defend the 15:03 based on the testimony of race organizer Brian Oster of Pro-Motion Events, who writes: "While it's true we didn't have time to certify the new route prior to the race (the final version wasn't approved by the City until late last week), I went over it twice with the wheel and can guarantee that -- assuming that everyone went the correct way -- it not only wasn't short, but was actually 10-12 feet long."

I pride myself on being a smart racer, and sometimes that pride is actually justified. The Fremont 5K includes a 5 x 1K Briefcase Relay in which a phone book-containing briefcase is passed like a baton, and I used the relay exchange zones to check my 1K, 2K, 3K, and 4K split times, thus getting more frequent pace feedback than I could get from the mile markers alone. The splits were rather pretty, too: 3:01, 6:00, 9:03, 12:02.

After the race, my entourage (my wife and her sister) joined me at the Olympia Pizza and Spaghetti House II in Wallingford, where I celebrated by ordering a baklava sundae. The guy sitting next to us, who ordered the same thing, must have overheard me yapping away about the race. When my sundae arrived, he said as he rose to leave, "That dessert will add 15 seconds to your 5K time. I used to run under 14 minutes ... but look at me now!"

Thanks for the nutritional tip, dude. Remind me to show up at your next birthday party so that I can return the favor.

June 7, 2006

12 years, 0 progress

Here are the results of the only three times I've raced a 1500m on a regulation track since entering college:

Jan. 15, 1994 -- at Williams College (MA), indoors -- 4:13.8

April 8, 1995 -- at Springfield College (MA) -- 4:12.3

June 7, 2006 -- at Shoreline Stadium (WA) -- 4:12.8

Considering how rarely I run this event, I'm remarkably consistent. Yep, I can just crank out those 4:12s like a semi-fit machine.

Exceeding my speed limit

"Next year, my 800m PR will be old enough to drive," says Parker Morse, reminiscing about a great race he ran in high school.

Although none of my PRs (personal records) are ready to take the wheel, I'll admit that some are now wearing braces and hanging out at malls. Specifically, my lame 1500m PR of 4:12 dates back to 1995, my senior year of college, and my not-as-lame bests of 8:43 for 3000m and 15:06 for 5000m are from the 1994 indoor season.

In the next few weeks, I want to upgrade all three of these PRs, starting with a 1500m race in a little less than 24 hours. It isn't a big disadvantage that my last race of this distance was eight years ago, since I didn't know how to run a 1500 back then, either. "Go out in 66 and hang on" hardly qualifies as a race strategy, but it might be enough to get me a 4:10. The important part is to get rid of the 4:12 -- I am not going to buy auto insurance for that sorry old thing.

June 6, 2006

Root, root, root for the home team

My wife and I saw the Seattle Mariners beat the Kansas City Royals 4-1 at Safeco Field last night thanks to some free 12th-row tickets from our friend Mary. The game itself was reasonably entertaining, but I was distracted even more than usual by the musical interludes, which offered a few surprises amidst the typical organ ditties and rock anthems. When Raul Ibanez stepped up to the plate, the announcer's pronunciation of "Ra-OOOL" was echoed by the howling "Ah-OOO" chorus of Werewolves of London. When Kenji "Jo" Johjima was at bat, we heard Jimi Hendrix's Hey Joe. (Nothing like a good wife-murder song to spice up a family outing at the ballpark!) And when Johjima foiled a steal attempt by David DeJesus, we celebrated with a few bars of Been Caught Stealing by Jane's Addiction. Clearly, the stadium DJ has an offbeat sense of humor.

June 4, 2006

Mathemadness

I am not a mathematician, but I once wrote a silly song about pi. That, presumably, is the reason why Reddivari Sarva Jagannadha Reddy, an Indian zoology teacher whom I do not know, keeps sending me articles in which he argues that pi equals 3.1464466... rather than the universally accepted value of 3.14159.... His latest mailing arrived this week, and it's a doozy: a self-published 228-page book, "The Untold Story of the True Value of Pi," containing over 50 distinct "proofs" supporting the value of 3.1464466....

Part of me admires Reddivari Sarva Jagannadha Reddy for his earnest and enthusiastic pursuit of knowledge, and part of me wants to believe that his work has some merit. But another part of me -- the part that isn't as nice -- is inclined to dismiss him as a freak.

So what should we do when encountering someone like Reddivari Sarva Jagannadha Reddy? Options include (A) avoidance, (B) polite acknowledgment, (C) concise unilateral rebuttal, and (D) patient give-and-take. (D) has the advantage of conceding that I might learn something from the man if I give him a chance to explain himself. Still, given his extreme confidence that pi equals 3.1464466..., and my extreme confidence that it equals 3.14159..., what are the odds that either of us could change the other's mind? Why waste his time and mine on a conversation that seems destined to go on and on without resolution, like the digits of an irrational number? Then again, how can we expect to change anyone else's mind about anything if we are unwilling to listen to those who disagree with us?

I don't know the answers to these questions, but I think the questions are important.

If you're reading this, Mr. Reddy, I hope you'll forgive my patronizing tone. I bet you're dead wrong about pi, but I may learn something from you yet.

June 1, 2006

What triathletes can teach us about semantic clarity

The word "elite" is used in a hundred different ways within the running community. Some regard anyone who wins a small local 5K as elite; others reserve the word for professional runners. It's confusing. Since marathons often make special arrangements for "elite athletes," I've had to ask more than one race coordinator, with as much humility as I can feign, "So, um, when you guys say 'elite' ... are you talking about people like me?"

The triathlon world apparently does not have this problem. A couple days ago, a triathlete told me that he had just gotten his elite license. Elite license? Yeah, he said -- you just have to place among the top X finishers at Y number of sanctioned triathlons of size Z or larger, and you qualify for a license to race in the elite division.

Perhaps that system will never be applied to runners, but I like its simplicity. If you have an elite license, you're elite; if you don't, you're not. Besides, wouldn't it be cool to have an official-looking wallet-sized card attesting to your elite status? The sort of thing you could whip out at a party to make a good first impression, if necessary?

I think I want one. Too bad I can barely swim. Perhaps I'll just have to get a fake elite athlete ID, with a photo that looks kind of like me and some bogus PRs.